The nearly invisible hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) is primarily to blame for the severe decline of eastern and Carolina hemlock currently taking place in the eastern forests of the United States.
There are other factors, however, that exacerbate the HWA problem for hemlocks. These include other pests and pathogens and a changing climate, bringing with it increased incidences of drought and rising temperatures, which contribute to the stress of trees already weakened by HWA.
The tiny, aphid-related HWA is a sucking insect native to Japan and is believed to have been introduced to the US, near Richmond, Virginia, on infested nursery stock sometime before 1951. These exotic adelgids feed only on hemlock and depend on the tree to complete their lifecycle. In eastern North America, HWA reproduces asexually. Every individual is essentially genetically identical, female and capable of reproducing. They have two generations each year, and with abundant hemlock hosts in eastern forests, HWA has reproduced rapidly. Incapable of moving on their own (in North America, HWA have useable legs for only a small portion of their lives), these little bugs disperse via wind, birds, animals, people and traffic. HWA was first detected in Shenandoah National Park in Virginia in the 1980s; by the early 2000s, its reach was significant and devastation was widespread.
HWA was first reported in North Carolina in 1995 in three counties adjacent to Virginia. In 2002, the pest was discovered in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park–home to 200,000 acres of old growth forest, 35,000 of which have a significant hemlock component. Coinciding with a severe drought, mortality was rapid and near complete, with the world’s largest known eastern hemlock, the “Caldwell Giant,” dead from HWA before it was discovered. HWA has progressed more rapidly and been more destructive in the southern Appalachians than originally expected, likely due to a combination of factors that includes drought, abundant hemlock populations, exceptionally large trees, and milder temperatures. In other parts of the eastern hemlock range, colder winters and hotter summers have slowed the advancement of the pest.
The hemlock woolly adelgid kills trees slowly, affixing itself to the base of the hemlock needle where it feeds on the tree’s starch reserves. HWA feeding interferes with the tree’s ability to take up water and nutrients, producing a drought like response that some researchers have likened to an allergic reaction. As a result, the hemlock’s needles take on a grey and dusty appearance and begin to drop. Increasingly unable to photosynthesize as it loses its needles, the tree slowly dies from the bottom up. Trees can succumb to the pest in as little as four years, but in some cases this takes much longer. Sadly, the largest trees, which require the movement of more water and nutrients to their crowns, appear to be the most vulnerable.
In Asia and the US Pacific Northwest, HWA native to those areas does not have the same devastating impact on hemlock populations. Even eastern hemlocks re-located to these areas do not succumb to adelgid pressure as they do in their native range on the east coast. It is believed that this is due to the co-evolution of western and Asian hemlocks with HWA and native predator insects. It is likely that the reason that these trees remain healthy, even when infested with HWA, is that a delicate predator/prey relationship between HWA and other native insects has been established over thousands of years of evolutionary history. It is also possible that in addition to the presence of native adelgid predators, western and Asian hemlock species have some form of innate resistance that allows them to tolerate the pest and remain healthy even when infested. While on the east coast, HWA has no specialized, native predators, and it is clear that eastern and Carolina hemlock species have no widespread natural resistance to HWA. Specialized HWA predators and possible genetic resistance – present in the native range of other hemlock species- are hopeful signs for researchers and natural resource managers working diligently to slow and stop the destruction that HWA is causing in the east.
list of sources  Aaron M Ellison, Michael S Bank, Barton D Clinton, Elizabeth A Colburn, Katherine Elliott, Chelcy R Ford, David R Foster, Brian D Kloeppel, Jennifer D Knoepp, Gary M Lovett, Jacqueline Mohan, David A Orwig, Nicholas L Rodenhouse, William V Sobczak, Kristina A Stinson, Jeffrey K Stone, Christopher M Swan, Jill Thompson, Betsy Von Holle, and Jackson R Webster, “Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested Ecosystems”, Frontiers in Ecology 3 (9) (2005): 485  Nathan P. Havill, Michael E. Montgomery, “The Role of Arboreta in Studying the Evolution of Host Resistance to the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid”, Arnoldia 65 (3) (2008): 4  Nathan Havill, Michael Montgomery, Melody Keena, “Chapter 1: Hemlock Woolly Adelgid and Its Hemlock Hosts: A Global Perspective” Implementation and Status of Biological Control of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, U.S. Forest Service Publication FHTET-2011-04 (2011): 7-8  See HWA distribution map.  Will Blozan, “The Last of the Giants: Documenting and Saving the Largest Eastern Hemlocks”, American Forests, Spring 2011, retrieved June 2017, http://www.americanforests.org/magazine/article/the-last-of-the-giants/  Havill et al. “Hemlock Woolly Adelgid and Its Hemlock Hosts”, 8  Evan L. Preisser, Kelly L.F. Oten, Fred P. Hain, “Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern United States: What Have We Learned?” South Eastern Naturalist 13, Special Issue 6 Forest Impacts and Ecosystem Effects of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern US (2014): 4, 148